A Case study: Sustainable development of Indigenous tourism in the Arctic.
'The agency of culture and ethics of authenticity in Lapland'
Amanda Homer-Nichol (2014 / reviewed and edited 2026)
Originally written in 2014 as a qualitative study for the MA Anthropology of Travel, Tourism and Pilgrimage at SOAS, this paper served as the foundation for an ongoing observational project and a solo expedition documenting the Arctic border in the Anthropocene. Given the continued relevance of the subject and a recent opportunity to conduct primary field research, this essay has been revised and updated to reflect current findings.
‘No society can flourish without culture, and no development can be sustainable without it’
(UNESCO, 2013).
Considered as the fourth pillar of sustainability, culture provides the meaning, values, and context necessary for the development of local and Indigenous communities. Cultural heritage is a living resource that shapes identity, supports social cohesion, and can act as a powerful socio-economic driver. In the context of tourism, culture becomes both an opportunity and a site of tension. While it can encourage intercultural understanding and economic development, it can also lead to exploitation, misrepresentation, and the commodification of Indigenous identities. Empowering Indigenous communities as active participants and educators within tourism is therefore essential, ensuring that development is ethical, inclusive, and beneficial to both hosts and visitors (Zeballos and Bchir, 2025; Astara, 2014).
The relationship between Indigenous tourism, economic development, and cultural integrity is complex. Tourism often brings much-needed investment into remote or marginalised regions; however, it frequently does so by changing culture into a consumable product (Cole, 2006). Craik (cited in Rojek and Urry, 2007) describes this as the ‘restructuring of cultural production into industry,’ whereby traditions, rituals, and identities are reconfigured to meet market demand. While this process may generate economic incentives to preserve certain cultural practices, it also risks reducing them to performance-based representations. Cassel and Maureira (2015) argue that this ‘capitalisation on difference’ can lead to a loss of authenticity, as traditions are adapted or staged to align with tourist expectations, often without meaningful benefits returning to the host communities.
Authenticity itself is a contested concept within tourism studies. Experiences presented as ‘authentic’ are often curated by hosts to meet visitor expectations, creating what MacCannell (1989) describes as staged authenticity. In this context, cultural practices are performed within controlled environments that mimic tradition whilst remaining accessible and understandable to outsiders. Though these experiences can still hold value, particularly when Indigenous communities retain control over how their culture is presented, they balance on a fine line between respectful representation and exploitation. When authenticity is reduced to performance, its deeper cultural, political, and spiritual meanings risk being stripped away, potentially reinforcing colonial narratives that portray Indigenous peoples as primitive, disconnected from modernity (Kirk, 2024).
Urry’s (1995) concept of the tourist gaze further explains how tourism constructs and reinforces these perceptions. According to Urry, tourism is shaped by visual consumption and contrast; tourists are drawn to places that appear different from their everyday lives. This desire for difference often manifests in the search for authentic Indigenous experiences, where visitors seek connection to cultures perceived as closer to nature or untouched by modernity. However, such expectations are shaped by Western imaginaries and historical narratives that romanticise Indigenous lifestyles while ignoring its complexity and diversity. As McIntosh and Prentice (1999) note, these encounters are often one-sided, structured by tourist expectations rather than genuine intercultural exchange.
This dynamic is particularly evident in the Arctic Circle, where tourism has grown significantly in recent decades. Factors such as climate change, increased accessibility, and global fascination with the region’s fragility have contributed to rising visitor numbers. Although the Arctic has not yet reached the levels of mass tourism seen in other global destinations, demand is rapidly increasing.
Sápmi, the traditional homeland of the Sámi people, spans across northern Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Russia, representing a cultural and geographical region defined by history, land use, and identity rather than political borders. The Sámi are one of Europe’s oldest Indigenous peoples, with archaeological evidence indicating continuous habitation for approximately 10,000 years (Zorich, 2008). Traditional livelihoods such as reindeer herding, fishing, and trapping remain central to Sámi culture, alongside practices such as joik (music) and duodji (handicrafts), which sustain language, knowledge systems, and spiritual connections to the land.
Despite this deep cultural heritage, Sámi communities have experienced extensive marginalisation. From the 18th century onwards, assimilation policies across Scandinavia sought to suppress Sámi language, identity, and cultural practices. Children were discouraged or punished for speaking Sámi languages, and traditional spiritual practices were undermined by Christian missions (Risto, 2024). Although cultural revival movements emerged after World War II, the impacts of this history continue to shape Sámi experiences today.
Tourism both reflects and reinforces these historical dynamics. Zorich’s (2008) research has been used to support Sámi land claims by challenging colonial narratives that portrayed them as inferior or primitive. However, such stereotypes persist within tourism marketing. Sámi culture is frequently represented through narrow and idealised imagery, i.e. traditional dress, reindeer, and Arctic tundra landscapes, creating an outdated, simplified depiction of a diverse and modern community. As Lehtola (2004) argues, this primitivisation is not accidental, but rooted in early anthropological and tourism discourses that framed Indigenous cultures as pre-modern.
One of the most prominent examples of this dynamic is the marketing of Lapland as the ‘home of Santa Claus,’ particularly in Rovaniemi. Developed in the mid-20th century to attract international tourism, these narratives bring a commercial fantasy onto the region. The ‘Santa Claus effect’ thus dominates tourism, presenting Lapland as a fairytale winter destination defined by snow, reindeer, and festive spectacle (Gardiner, 2021). While economically successful, this branding often sidelines Sámi culture, presenting it as secondary—or even irrelevant—to the tourist experience.
Santa Claus Village exemplifies the tensions between economic benefit and cultural integrity. Attracting over 600,000 visitors annually, with peaks during the Christmas season, it generates significant revenue and employment opportunities (Ledsom, 2025; Forbes, 2025). However, this influx also creates challenges, including overtourism, housing shortages, and environmental strain. Local residents face increasing difficulty accessing affordable long-term accommodation, while infrastructure is placed under significant pressure. At the same time, climate change poses a growing threat to the region, with Lapland warming at rates well above the global average. Shorter winters with more rain and less snow directly undermine the winter experiences that attract tourists, raising questions about the long-term sustainability of the industry.
Other tourist experiences, such as crossing the Arctic Circle, further illustrate the construction of meaning within tourism. Although the Arctic Circle is a real geographical boundary, it becomes a symbolic and celebratory ritual, simplifying the landscape into a commodity. For visitors, crossing this invisible line signifies entry into an ethereal North, with a stamped postcard as evidence, reinforcing the tourist gaze and detaching the region from its lived realities. For local communities, however, the Arctic Circle is not an exotic frontier but a place of everyday life, work, and cultural continuity.
Despite these challenges, Sámi communities are not passive participants in tourism. Increasingly, they are engaging with the industry as a platform for cultural preservation, education, and economic development. Research by Tuulentie highlights how Sámi voices actively challenge dominant narratives, while initiatives such as Visit Sápmi promote community-led tourism that prioritises cultural integrity and sustainability. These approaches emphasise the importance of collaboration, respect, and local knowledge in shaping tourism experiences.
Community-led initiatives demonstrate that tourism can be both economically viable and culturally respectful when Indigenous communities retain control over their development and representation. For example, Sámi-run cultural centres such as Nutti Sámi Siida in Jukkasjärvi and Sápmi park in Karasjok provide opportunities for visitors to engage with authentic practices, learn about Indigenous history, and understand the contemporary realities of Sámi life. Such models challenge the dominance of large-scale commercial operators and offer alternative frameworks for sustainable tourism.
However, significant challenges remain. Misrepresentation persists through the use of ‘fake Sámi’ imagery, imitation costumes, and staged performances that distort cultural identity. Advocacy campaigns such as ‘No Fake Sámis’ (Barents Indigenous Peoples Office) highlight the ongoing misuse of Sámi culture within tourism, emphasising the need for greater accountability and authenticity. These practices not only misinform visitors but also reinforce stereotypes and contribute to cultural marginalisation.
More broadly, Indigenous tourism reflects wider social dynamics, including class, identity, and the search for authenticity. As Graburn (1983) suggests, the desire for authentic cultural experiences is often linked to social status and education, with tourists seeking meaningful engagement as a form of cultural self-expression. Cohen’s typology further identifies ‘explorers’ and ‘drifters’ as those most likely to pursue such experiences, travelling beyond mass tourism in search of deeper connections. However, these encounters are shaped by unequal power relations, where affluent tourists can temporarily adopt aspects of Indigenous life that are, for host communities, enduring realities.
Ultimately, Indigenous tourism in Sápmi reveals the complex and often contradictory relationship between culture, commerce, and sustainability. While tourism offers significant economic opportunities, it also risks reinforcing historical inequalities through the commodification and misrepresentation of Sámi identity. The persistence of the Santa Claus effect, staged authenticity, and romanticised narratives demonstrates how deeply embedded these issues remain within global tourism systems.
However, this analysis also highlights the potential for change. When Sámi communities are empowered to lead and shape tourism development, it can become a tool for cultural preservation, education, and political recognition rather than exploitation. Community-led initiatives, ethical tourism models, and increasing awareness among visitors all point towards a more inclusive and sustainable future.
For tourism to be truly sustainable, it must move beyond superficial representations and engage with the lived realities of Indigenous communities. This requires not only structural change within the industry but also a shift in tourist attitudes—away from consumption and towards respect, understanding, and reciprocity. By centring Indigenous voices and knowledge, tourism can evolve from a source of cultural tension into a platform for empowerment and intercultural dialogue.
In this sense, the future of tourism in Sápmi—and in Indigenous contexts more broadly—depends not on the continuation of marketable myths, but on the recognition of authenticity as something defined and controlled by the communities themselves.
Bibliography
Abram, J. Waldren & D. V. L. MacLeod (Eds), Tourists and Tourism. Identifying with People and Places, pp. 13–28 (Oxford: Berg).
Aikio, A.K. (n.d.) Statements on Sámi representation in tourism. Available at: https://www.barentsindigenous.org(Accessed: 10 April 2026).
Astara, O. H. (2014) 'Culture as the fourth pillar of sustainable development', Sustainable Development, Culture, Traditions, 1a, pp. 93–105. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373829098_CULTURE_AS_THE_FOURTH_PILLAR_OF_SUSTAINABLE_DEVELOPMENT (Accessed: 8 April 2026).
Barents Indigenous Peoples Office (n.d.) Sápmi: No Fake Sámis – Stop the misuse of our culture. Available at: https://www.barentsindigenous.org (Accessed: 10 April 2026).
Blix, B. Hamran, T. Normann, H. (2013) Struggles of being and becoming: A dialogical narrative analysis of the life stories of Sami elderly, Journal of Aging Studies, Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 264-275,
Bruner, E.M. (2005) Culture on tour: Ethnographies of travel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Calí Tzay, J.F. (2023) Tourism and the rights of Indigenous Peoples. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, A/78/162. United Nations, 12 July. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/thematic-reports/a78162-tourism-and-rights-indigenous-peoples-report-special-rapporteur (Accessed: 10 April 2026).
Cassel, S Maureira T. Performing identity and culture in Indigenous tourism – a study of Indigenous communities in Québec, Canada 2015 Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change 15(1):1-14
Clifford, J. (2013) Being Indigenous in the Twenty-First Century. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research Press.
Cohen, E. (1985) the tourist guide: The origins, structure and dynamics of a role. Annals of Tourism Research, 1, pp. 5–29.
Cole, S. (2006) 'Cultural tourism, community participation and empowerment', in Smith, M. K. and Robinson, M. (eds.) Cultural Tourism in a Changing World: Politics, Participation and (Re)presentation. Bristol: Channel View Publications, pp. 89–103.
Eriksen, T.H. (2010) Small Places, Large Issues: An Introduction to Social and Cultural Anthropology. London: Pluto Press.
Fredriksson, M. (ed.) (2011) Current Issues in European Cultural Studies: Conference Proceedings. Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press. Available at: liu.se (Accessed: 8 April 2026)
Gardiner, K. (2021) Stereotypes have fuelled a tourism boom in Europe’s icy North. Can things change? National Geographic, 3 February. Available at: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/travel/article/changing-indigneous-cultural-tourism-in-arctic-sapmi-region (Accessed: 10 April 2026).
Giovanna B (2011) Communities of Practice in Tourism: Working and Learning Together. An Illustrative Case Study from Northern Norway, Tourism Planning & Development, 8:4, 381-39
Griffin and Williams (2002) Sustainable Development: a global perspective, Harris
Kent, N. (2014) A Concise History of the Sami. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lapointe, D. (2018). Tourism and Indigeneity in the Arctic. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 13(4), 378–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2017.1400197
Ledsom, A. (2025) Santa’s village in Finland—the new face of Europe overtourism. Forbes, 30 December. Available at: Santa’s Village In Finland—The New Face Of Europe Overtourism (Accessed: 10 April 2026).
Lehtola, V.-P. (2004) The Sámi People: Traditions in Transition. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press.
Lindholm C. (2009) Culture and Authenticity (Blackwell publishing) London
Lindsay Elizabeth Doran (2023). ‘For Their Own Good’: Examining ‘Gentle’ Colonialism and Finnish Exceptionalism Within Narratives of Finland’s Indigenous Residential Schools. Scandinavian Journal of History, pp.1–24.
MacCannell, D. (1989) The Tourist. A New Theory of the Leisure Class (New York: Schocken Books).
McIntosh, A. J. and Prentice, R. C. (1999) 'Affirming authenticity: consuming cultural heritage', Annals of Tourism Research, 26(3), pp. 589–612
Melikova M. (2001) How sustainable is sustainable tourism - annals of tourism research vol28, no. 2
Mowforth, M. & Munt, I. (1998) Tourism and Sustainability. New tourism in the Third World (London: Routledge).
Nash D (2001) on travelers, ethnographers and tourists – annals of tourism research vol 28 no. 2 p 493-496 Elsevier science Ltd
Notzke, C. (2006) The stranger, the native and the land: Indigenous tourism in Canada. Ontario: Captus Press.
Olsen, K. (2006) Making Differences in a Changing World: The Norwegian Sami in the Tourist Industry, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 6(1), pp. 37–53.
Reisinger Y & Steiner C (2006) Reconceptualising Interpretation: The Role of Tour Guides in Authentic Tourism, Current Issues in Tourism, 9:6, 481-49
Risto, T. (2024). Between Norwegianisation and Revitalisation in the South Sami Society: A Memory Culture Analysis of Boarding School Life and Its Aftermath. History of Education, 53(1), 126–143.
Saarinen, J. (2001) The transformation of a tourist destination. Theory and case studies on the production of local geographies in tourism in Finnish Lapland, Nordia, Geographical Publications, 1.
Silvén E. Nomadising Sami Collections Nordiska Museet, Stockholm Conference Proceedings published by Linköping University Electronic Press: http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp_home/index.en.aspx?issue=062.
The International Ecotourism Society (2011) VisitSápmi: Promoting an Authentic Sámi Experience through Sustainable Tourism. Available at: http://www.ecotourism.org/news/visits%C3%A1pmi-promoting-authentic-s%C3%A1mi-experience-through-sustainable-tourism (Accessed: 8 April 2026)
The Swedish Institute (1999) The Sámi People in Sweden. Available at: http://www.samenland.nl/lapland/lap_sami_si.html (Accessed: 8 April 2026).
United Nations (n.d.) Indigenous peoples and tourism. Available at: https://www.un.org (Accessed: 10 April 2026).
Urry, J. (1990) The Tourist Gaze. Leisure and Travel in Contemporary Society (London: Sage).
Utsi, L.M. (n.d.) No Fake Sámis: Stop the misuse of our culture. Barents Indigenous Peoples Office. Available at: https://www.barentsindigenous.org (Accessed: 10 April 2026).
Veli-Pekka Lehtola, The Sámi People – Traditions in Transition (2004) and Saamelaiset suomalaiset – Kohtaamisia 1896–1953
Viken, A. (2006) Tourism and Sami identity – an analysis of the tourism-identity nexus in a Sámi community, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 6, pp. 7–24.
Viken, A. (2022). Tourism appropriation of Sámi land and culture. Acta Borealia, 39(2), 95–114.
Virk, C. S. (2024). Settler colonialism and Indigenous tourism: The pattern of exploitation, assimilation and erasure. Agoriad: A Journal of Spatial Theory, 1, article 1.8.
VisitSápmi: Promoting an Authentic Sámi Experience through Sustainable Tourism)
Zeballos, C. and Bchir, E. (2025) 'Culture: the fourth pillar of sustainability: why sustainable design must be rooted in people, place, and local knowledge', UIA Magazine, 15 October. Available at: https://www.uia-architectes.org/en/mag/culture-the-fourth-pillar-of-sustainability-why-sustainable-design-must-be-rooted-in-people-place-and-local-knowledge/ (Accessed: 8 April 2026)
Zorich, Z. (2008) 'The Sámi: ancestors of the Arctic', Archaeology, 61(1), pp. 38–43.